![]() Los relatos inventados de violación carecen de comportamiento seudoíntimo y de una gran variedad de actos sexuales. ![]() Así, había más variables significativamente codificadas como “presentes” en las alegaciones probablemente verdaderas. La prueba independiente t mostró una diferencia entre el número medio de alegaciones probablemente verdaderas codificadas como “presentes” ( M = 59.13, DT = 11.00) y de falsas alegaciones ( M = 35.74, SD = 9.33), t(63) = 9.28, p <. El método de Holm-Bonferroni con la corrección de Šidák se utilizó para corregir el error relativo a la familia. Los resultados de la condición control ( N = 30) se compararon con los de la condición experimental ( N = 35) mediante la prueba de chi-cuadrado. Se sumaron todas las variables codificadas como “presentes” en los casos para obtener una puntuación total se utilizó una prueba t independiente. Todos los elementos de la lista se codificaron dicotómicamente. Elaboramos una lista de 187 variables partiendo de nuestra teoría de la violación inventada. Los participantes de esta condición, todas mujeres, tenían una edad entre 18 y 52 años ( M = 28.0 y DT = 10.6). En la condición experimental se invitó a mujeres a presentar una falsa alegación. Las víctimas, todas mujeres, tenían una edad entre 17 y 53 años ( M = 28.0 y DT = 10.6). En la condición de control las alegaciones verdaderas se obtuvieron de los archivos policiales. Para estudiar la diferencia entre alegaciones verdaderas y falsas utilizamos un enfoque cuasi-experimental. Las falsas alegaciones constituyen un problema dado que pueden causar daño. The differences could be used to predict the true nature of a rape allegation. In conclusion, true and false allegations diverge from each other in essentials of the story told by the complainant. Also, in almost all fabricated stories of rape the attack was completed in less than 15 minutes while in likely true allegations the attack sometimes took over 60 minutes before it was completed. Fabricated stories of rape lack pseudo-intimate behavior and a wide variety of sexual acts. Thus, significantly more variables were coded ‘present’ in likely true allegations. The independent t-test showed a significant difference between the mean number of present-coding of likely true allegations, ( M = 59.13, SD = 11.00) and of false allegations ( M = 35.74, SD = 9.33), t(63) = 9.28, p <. A Holm-Bonferoni method with Šidák correction was used to correct for the increased family-wise error rate. The results of the control condition ( N = 30) were compared with the experimental condition ( N = 35) by use of chi-square tests. All variables that were coded as ‘present’ within cases were summed to obtain a total score an independent t-test was used. All items in the list were coded dichotomously. We constructed a list of 187 variables based on our theory of fabricated rape. Participants, all female, in the experimental conditions were between the ages of 18 and 52 ( M = 28.0, SD = 10.6). In the experimental condition women were invited to file a false allegation. The victims, all female, were between the ages of 17 and 53 ( M = 28.0, SD = 10.6). In the control condition likely true allegations were retrieved from criminal files. To study the difference between true and false allegations we used a quasi-experimental approach. False allegations constitute a problem since they may cause harm.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |